First, thank you to the folks who have purchased Boom and Zoom. It is still hanging on to the best sellers at Wargame Vault. I have gotten no feedback which has me wondering. Is that good in that people understand them? Is that bad in that people aren't trying them?
I suspect people just haven't digested them yet as it has only been 2 weeks and they are different. It took about a month before I got feedback on Platoon Forward and Squadron Forward and all of it has been positive to this day. Cold War Tanker is my most popular seller on Wargame Vault though it is 6 years old. All I got were questions on stats.
Anyway...During breaks of testing Boom and Zoom, I again starting thinking about my company land combat. Me thinking is bad because that means I am going to change something. I have been playing PBI and having fun but after a year I still didn't think troops became pinned enough [sorry Martin] and it still seemed too easy to get troops to do what I wanted even with my piquet cards. I remembered the old GMT game Fields of Fire which is so command and detail heavy that it is actually too much even for me. What if I streamlined FoF and made the perfect solitaire company level game?! Should be easy! Well friends, after some small skirmishes to test out my streamlining I present the first test game of....
Fire Fields !
It is 75% Fields of Fire and has several interesting mechanics which make it different from every other tactical game I have played. The Author of FoF stated he designed his game as the anti- ASL for those of you who recognize that. He wanted a realistic infantry combat game. [ He was a reserve marine officer but we don't hold that against him Jack!]
- Troops will shoot back. You don't have to order troops to shoot. You have to order them to stop or to shift fire.
- Troops do not move fast in combat. No one is in a hurry to be killed
- It is easy to pin troops down but unless pinning fire remains most troops will unpin by themselves
- It is actually hard to kill troops
- Squad integrity breaks down in combat. It takes leadership to maintain.
- Fire is rarely cumulative. The heaviest weapon is what counts unless you have a crossfire.
So this is my first company game of FF including an AI opponent that I have been working on.
The Panwar valley 1982
In FF the board consists of areas like PBI. Rather than squares I am using hexon tiles. For now you can move diagonally but that might change. There is a irrigation ditch on the left that counts as its own terrain because it is important.
The operation will have a Russian airborne company land and take control of the village while waiting for the Afghan army to come up the road from the left. The Russians choose two landing zones; the field next to the canal LZ 1 and the broken terrain south of the road outside of town on the right will be LZ 2. We can land 2 Mi-8s for a total 20ish troops per stick per LZ.
Here is our test company. Russian paratrooper squads are small; 7 men. To represent them I will have the first squad have 3 bases and the second 2 squads 2 bases. We have an actual LMG attached [ each squad has a SAW] plus two automatic grenade launchers. All leaders are average except our 2nd PLT leader is a star. There is one squad veteran and one squad green. I have a company XO. I would normally have a 1st Sgt but in the Russian army the the NCOs aren't trained to a high standard so he won't be represented today.
What is your plan Captain?
Our plan is:
2nd Plt will land at LZ 1 in two sticks with an attached grenade launcher. They will proceed north into the town.
1st Plt will land at LZ 2 in two sticks accompanied by Company CO,FAC, LMG and grenade launcher. They will neutralize hill south of LZ while simultaneously blocking road into town north of LZ and entering into the town.
3rd Plt will remain at base with XO as reserve.
What could go wrong?
View of town from the south
FF uses the blinds from PF. Blinds in place. There will also be 3 As and 1 C as reinforcements between turn 3-5.
Aviation assets strike areas around the LZs. We are Russians so everything is a free fire zone!
LZ 2 minutes after landing. 1 squad deployed north on LZ taking and returning fire from a sangar near the road. 1 squad south and all quiet there. The hill is unoccupied.To give you an idea how the game works, our Capt rolls up 2 orders. With 1 order he looks for good cover and finds it. With the second order he orders 1st squad into it. 2nd squad does nothing facing south. The pipe cleaners show primary direction of fire. 1st squads PDF is towards the sangar and visa versa. They are also taking fire from the town but the source is unspotted. Hence they are caught in a crossfire.
2nd Plt lands in the field.
Even though the LT is a star he only gets 2 orders as well. With a cold LZ he orders 1st squad to find cover and watch north. With his second order he orders 2nd squad into the ditch and to infiltrate around the village.
He hears several shots from the town as 2nd squad runs into a sniper by the market. One of the rules I really like is now you get to roll to see if any of the units show their own initiative. We get 1 order. 2nd squad attempts to spot the sniper but fail. Aviation assets see bad guys out in the open shooting and come in to strafe.
Shooting is simultaneous towards the end of the turn. The helicopter eliminates the enemy in the Sanger. However, 1st squad continues to fire at the sangar. Also, since no bombs fell in the village this turn the enemy there are no longer pinned.
H hour + 5ish
The CO gets 3 orders. Since the platoon leaders have radios he discusses the situation with his platoon leaders [ activates them] and with his last order spots enemy troops in the town. Our star LT gets 3 orders. He uses the first to have 1st squad sneak into town to see what exactly is going on. [ You also see the third squad landed with the auto grenade launcher]
Back at LZ 2 the Lt orders 2nd squad to enflade the town by sneaking into the rough ground around the road. Their sneaking fails as well. Something we need to practice with our junior NCOs. This does set up a cross fire though. Now we see how the shooting went...
1st Platoon throws some RPGs into the town and the enemy pulls back into the hills. 3rd squad moves into the abandoned Sangar.
Unpinned but taking fire the CO gets 4 orders. What to do? [ this is where the game shines for me!] Talk to both platoons? Play hero and rally the men at the LZ? Call in the Gunships? What would YOU do? First he calls the gunships to strafe the road east of town; success! 1 order. Second he contacts first platoon [activates] on how to save the LZ. Last he switches frequency and calls back to base to order his XO and 3rd platoon to land at LZ 1 [ two orders]. Lt Star is on his own. He is a star; he will be okay. As if we didn't have enough going on the Afghan army shows up at the weest end of town.
They quickly take casualties and become pinned. They do pin the rebels however.
2nd squad, 1st Plt takes a casualty from the sniper and they also panic!
They decide to bring him to the casualty collection point at LZ 1.
Lt Star, even though having no contact with the company, has 3 orders to work with. [ that is why he is a star!] He orders the squad to advance further into the town but goes with them. Orders them into buildings. Then looks to spot the sniper. [ fails]
H + 30
3rd Platoon (-) lands. Casualties are evacuated.The AI orders 3 rebels to charge the Afghans. they are cut down. [ Probably have to work on this.] the rebels are surrounded by pinned afghans and russian paratroopers. Back at LZ 1 4 rebels in the woods have been killed which caused the rest to withdraw. Unfortunately, 3rd squad in the sangar has also been wiped out.The second stick lands at LZ 1 lands. The XO jumps out to see the remnants of 2nd sq/1Plt bringing in their wounded. " You men, snap out of it! You are now attached to 3rd squad/3rd Plt!" The helicopter does its work and breaks the rebel advance!
3rd Platoon moving into town!
With a sniper in the mosque and half a squad still in the western part of the city I called the game. It was a lot of fun! The narrative is strong as you see each unit struggle to accomplish their tasks. Did I win? We did clear the road. We killed some rebels. We lost 5 stands of paratroopers. The afghan army was worthless. Sounds pretty realistic to me.
Hope you enjoyed this preliminary look at Fire Fields!
Enjoy Joe







































I need to check that out... interesting set of rules. Incidentally I'm hoping to give Boom and Zoom a play through over the holidays...just got to get my act together 😁
ReplyDeleteJim, Thanks for the comments. They are interesting but time intensive. I am trying to streamline "just enough". : ) Thanks for your donation! Let me know what you think. Any questions just ask.
ReplyDeleteI am interested. You indicate a couple rules sets in use, your own plus Fields of Fire. Is this game capable of running a company or larger or is effectively a platoon the limit?
ReplyDeleteGreat question. Yes I am being transparent for everyone as I playtest things. To clarify, I am using Platoon Forward for enemy placement. Fields of Fire as the base for my adaption of the rules to miniatures which I am calling Fire fields. I am designing them for company actions plus a support platoon of vehicles/ AT guns ect. They would slow to a crawl for battalion level actions unless you upscaled everything. They will work fine with a platoon on the table.
ReplyDeleteThat help?
Joe
According to the cover (I haven't read it yet) Platoon Forward is a solo system designed for any platoon level game. Is fire fields going to be a full game or a set of rules to be hung around another system? Looking at Fields of Fire it appears to be a card game with forces and terrain existing only as abstract as opposed to on a game map, is this correct?
ReplyDeleteI have been using Platoon Forward scenarios and grunts forward for my company level games. They work well.
ReplyDeleteRegarding fire fields I would guess it would be free standing. What I do is design a game that I want to play. Once finished if there is enough there to publish I figure that out. I am just starting here.
Fields of fire has an abstract board but the units are not. They are squads and fire teams. It really isn't a card game.
Platoon Forward and Grunts Forward are basically scenario generators? And/or are they solo systems to handle various rules? I am looking at Fields of Fire on BGG and I see no map, unless the "map" is created by the placement of various cards (similar to Warfighter).
ReplyDeleteI looked at this as I am very interested in the Soviet-Afghan war. The scenario above looks like a single platoon with support from an aviation detachment, a company's weapons platoon and possibly a squad or two from another platoon or specialist group.
Picked up Grunts forward and looks good, but. Have you worked up tabled for Soviet-Afghan war and maybe War on Terror (post 9/11), African/south-Central America, and Cartel Wars? I would be very interested in them. Especially S-A war as your info seems limited to WWII Russians and not later. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteI would be happy to work up a background table for S-A war and post 9-11. For post 9-11 the grunt's forward scenario table should work pretty well. Substitute "Raid" scenario for half of the village sweeps. Raid is going after a bomb making site and/or HVT. It is on the website here. If you can't find it let me know. S-A scenarios probably need a new table. Are you doing paratroopers or motorized troops?
ReplyDeleteJoe
I saw one marked as post 9/11 and what stuck out is one of the "backgrounds" is mine owner while none for manufacturing plant owner.
ReplyDeleteI would be very happy if you did background tables for the S-A war including backgrounds, military awards (can't remember where I saw that) and is it possible to make this from both sides? Again just bought G-F so haven't seen if it covers both sides. Sometimes it would be fun to game from the Mujahedeen side. Thank you.
I will work on some tables this week. I think I can update grunts forward for everyone to download. I don't think I know enough about the Mujedeen to make tables for them, sorry.
ReplyDeleteThanks for asking about some new content!
Be appreciated. I like playing both sides when we play various asymmetric games is all. Maybe once I am familiar I can work something up. Does it have to be accurate or maybe "Hollywood accurate"?
ReplyDeleteI started today. I am updating grunts forward. Am including my FFL table as well. Regarding accurate, I try for pretty accurate with the occasional flare. : )
ReplyDeleteWell I kinda defy you to get accurate info on Mujahedeen to make tables from, hence my "Hollywood" accurate statement.
ReplyDeleteFeel free to do "Hollywood" accurate. The game ultimately is for your enjoyment. I am explaining to you that I try to publish reasonably accurate things. If a modification increases your enjoyment by all means do it. I agree it would be hard here in the west to make it very accurate.
ReplyDelete